Search for: All records

Inspired by recent work on learning with distribution shift, we give a general outlier removal algorithm called iterative polynomial filtering and show a number of striking applications for supervised learning with contamination: (1) We show that any function class that can be approximated by low-degree polynomials with respect to a hypercontractive distribution can be efficiently learned under bounded contamination (also known as nasty noise). This is a surprising resolution to a longstanding gap between the complexity of agnostic learning and learning with contamination, as it was widely believed that low-degree approximators only implied tolerance to label noise. (2) For any function class that admits the (stronger) notion of sandwiching approximators, we obtain near-optimal learning guarantees even with respect to heavy additive contamination, where far more than 1/2 of the training set may be added adversarially. Prior related work held only for regression and in a list-decodable setting. (3) We obtain the first efficient algorithms for tolerant testable learning of functions of halfspaces with respect to any fixed log-concave distribution. Even the non-tolerant case for a single halfspace in this setting had remained open. These results significantly advance our understanding of efficient supervised learning under contamination, a setting that has been much less studied than its unsupervised counterpart. 

The seminal work of Linial, Mansour, and Nisan gave a quasipolynomial-time algorithm for learning constant-depth circuits (𝖠𝖢0) with respect to the uniform distribution on the hypercube. Extending their algorithm to the setting of malicious noise, where both covariates and labels can be adversarially corrupted, has remained open. Here we achieve such a result, inspired by recent work on learning with distribution shift. Our running time essentially matches their algorithm, which is known to be optimal assuming various cryptographic primitives. Our proof uses a simple outlier-removal method combined with Braverman's theorem for fooling constant-depth circuits. We attain the best possible dependence on the noise rate and succeed in the harshest possible noise model (i.e., contamination or so-called "nasty noise"). 

Recent work of Klivans, Stavropoulos, and Vasilyan initiated the study of testable learning with distribution shift (TDS learning), where a learner is given labeled samples from training distribution D, unlabeled samples from test distribution D′, and the goal is to output a classifier with low error on D′ whenever the training samples pass a corresponding test. Their model deviates from all prior work in that no assumptions are made on D′. Instead, the test must accept (with high probability) when the marginals of the training and test distributions are equal. Here we focus on the fundamental case of intersections of halfspaces with respect to Gaussian training distributions and prove a variety of new upper bounds including a 2(k/ϵ)O(1)poly(d)-time algorithm for TDS learning intersections of k homogeneous halfspaces to accuracy ϵ (prior work achieved d(k/ϵ)O(1)). We work under the mild assumption that the Gaussian training distribution contains at least an ϵ fraction of both positive and negative examples (ϵ-balanced). We also prove the first set of SQ lower-bounds for any TDS learning problem and show (1) the ϵ-balanced assumption is necessary for poly(d,1/ϵ)-time TDS learning for a single halfspace and (2) a dΩ~(log1/ϵ) lower bound for the intersection of two general halfspaces, even with the ϵ-balanced assumption. Our techniques significantly expand the toolkit for TDS learning. We use dimension reduction and coverings to give efficient algorithms for computing a localized version of discrepancy distance, a key metric from the domain adaptation literature. 

Recent work of Klivans, Stavropoulos, and Vasilyan initiated the study of testable learning with distribution shift (TDS learning), where a learner is given labeled samples from training distribution , unlabeled samples from test distribution ′, and the goal is to output a classifier with low error on ′ whenever the training samples pass a corresponding test. Their model deviates from all prior work in that no assumptions are made on ′. Instead, the test must accept (with high probability) when the marginals of the training and test distributions are equal. Here we focus on the fundamental case of intersections of halfspaces with respect to Gaussian training distributions and prove a variety of new upper bounds including a 2(k/ϵ)O(1)𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗒(d)-time algorithm for TDS learning intersections of k homogeneous halfspaces to accuracy ϵ (prior work achieved d(k/ϵ)O(1)). We work under the mild assumption that the Gaussian training distribution contains at least an ϵ fraction of both positive and negative examples (ϵ-balanced). We also prove the first set of SQ lower-bounds for any TDS learning problem and show (1) the ϵ-balanced assumption is necessary for 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗒(d,1/ϵ)-time TDS learning for a single halfspace and (2) a dΩ̃ (log1/ϵ) lower bound for the intersection of two general halfspaces, even with the ϵ-balanced assumption. Our techniques significantly expand the toolkit for TDS learning. We use dimension reduction and coverings to give efficient algorithms for computing a localized version of discrepancy distance, a key metric from the domain adaptation literature. 

We revisit the fundamental problem of learning with distribution shift, in which a learner is given labeled samples from training distribution D, unlabeled samples from test distribution D′ and is asked to output a classifier with low test error. The standard approach in this setting is to bound the loss of a classifier in terms of some notion of distance between D and D′. These distances, however, seem difficult to compute and do not lead to efficient algorithms. We depart from this paradigm and define a new model called testable learning with distribution shift, where we can obtain provably efficient algorithms for certifying the performance of a classifier on a test distribution. In this model, a learner outputs a classifier with low test error whenever samples from D and D′ pass an associated test; moreover, the test must accept if the marginal of D equals the marginal of D′. We give several positive results for learning well-studied concept classes such as halfspaces, intersections of halfspaces, and decision trees when the marginal of D is Gaussian or uniform on {±1}d. Prior to our work, no efficient algorithms for these basic cases were known without strong assumptions on D′. For halfspaces in the realizable case (where there exists a halfspace consistent with both D and D′), we combine a moment-matching approach with ideas from active learning to simulate an efficient oracle for estimating disagreement regions. To extend to the non-realizable setting, we apply recent work from testable (agnostic) learning. More generally, we prove that any function class with low-degree L2-sandwiching polynomial approximators can be learned in our model. We apply constructions from the pseudorandomness literature to obtain the required approximators. 

We give the first efficient algorithm for learning halfspaces in the testable learning model recently defined by Rubinfeld and Vasilyan [2022]. In this model, a learner certifies that the accuracy of its output hypothesis is near optimal whenever the training set passes an associated test, and training sets drawn from some target distribution must pass the test. This model is more challenging than distribution-specific agnostic or Massart noise models where the learner is allowed to fail arbitrarily if the distributional assumption does not hold. We consider the setting where the target distribution is the standard Gaussian in dimensions and the label noise is either Massart or adversarial (agnostic). For Massart noise, our tester-learner runs in polynomial time and outputs a hypothesis with (information-theoretically optimal) error (and extends to any fixed strongly log-concave target distribution). For adversarial noise, our tester-learner obtains error in polynomial time. Prior work on testable learning ignores the labels in the training set and checks that the empirical moments of the covariates are close to the moments of the base distribution. Here we develop new tests of independent interest that make critical use of the labels and combine them with the moment-matching approach of Gollakota et al. [2022]. This enables us to implement a testable variant of the algorithm of Diakonikolas et al. [2020a, 2020b] for learning noisy halfspaces using nonconvex SGD. 

The noise sensitivity of a Boolean function f: {0,1}^n - > {0,1} is one of its fundamental properties. For noise parameter delta, the noise sensitivity is denoted as NS_{delta}[f]. This quantity is defined as follows: First, pick x = (x_1,...,x_n) uniformly at random from {0,1}^n, then pick z by flipping each x_i independently with probability delta. NS_{delta}[f] is defined to equal Pr [f(x) != f(z)]. Much of the existing literature on noise sensitivity explores the following two directions: (1) Showing that functions with low noise-sensitivity are structured in certain ways. (2) Mathematically showing that certain classes of functions have low noise sensitivity. Combined, these two research directions show that certain classes of functions have low noise sensitivity and therefore have useful structure. The fundamental importance of noise sensitivity, together with this wealth of structural results, motivates the algorithmic question of approximating NS_{delta}[f] given an oracle access to the function f. We show that the standard sampling approach is essentially optimal for general Boolean functions. Therefore, we focus on estimating the noise sensitivity of monotone functions, which form an important subclass of Boolean functions, since many functions of interest are either monotone or can be simply transformed into a monotone function (for example the class of unate functions consists of all the functions that can be made monotone by reorienting some of their coordinates [O'Donnell, 2014]). Specifically, we study the algorithmic problem of approximating NS_{delta}[f] for monotone f, given the promise that NS_{delta}[f] >= 1/n^{C} for constant C, and for delta in the range 1/n <= delta <= 1/2. For such f and delta, we give a randomized algorithm performing O((min(1,sqrt{n} delta log^{1.5} n))/(NS_{delta}[f]) poly (1/epsilon)) queries and approximating NS_{delta}[f] to within a multiplicative factor of (1 +/- epsilon). Given the same constraints on f and delta, we also prove a lower bound of Omega((min(1,sqrt{n} delta))/(NS_{delta}[f] * n^{xi})) on the query complexity of any algorithm that approximates NS_{delta}[f] to within any constant factor, where xi can be any positive constant. Thus, our algorithm's query complexity is close to optimal in terms of its dependence on n. We introduce a novel descending-ascending view of noise sensitivity, and use it as a central tool for the analysis of our algorithm. To prove lower bounds on query complexity, we develop a technique that reduces computational questions about query complexity to combinatorial questions about the existence of "thin" functions with certain properties. The existence of such "thin" functions is proved using the probabilistic method. These techniques also yield new lower bounds on the query complexity of approximating other fundamental properties of Boolean functions: the total influence and the bias.